Over 4,800 preventive detentions in Prayagraj, Ghaziabad since 2024: Court says powers ‘misused to hilt’

5 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Jun 9, 2026 12:09 PM IST

The petitioner in the case was detained under sections 170, 126 and 135 of the BNSS after he allegedly abused villagers and created an apprehension of breach of peace. (AI-generated image)

More than 2,300 people have been detained under preventive provisions in Prayagraj Commissionerate since 2024, while over 2,500 others were similarly detained in Ghaziabad over one year, prompting the Allahabad High Court to flag what it called a “shocking state of affairs” and the misuse of preventive detention powers.

A bench of Justices Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi was hearing a plea alleging illegal detention of a man in Prayagraj. The court subsequently directed the Uttar Pradesh government to pay Rs 2 lakh compensation to the man who was illegally kept in judicial custody for eight days.

“This is shocking state of affairs in the Commissionerate, Prayagraj. The Commissioner of Police has been given the powers of a Magistrate, which are being misused to the hilt,” the court observed in its order dated June 8.

Justices Siddharth and Vinai Kumar Dwivedi made the observation on June 8.

Plea against detention

The plea alleged that the Station House Officer (SHO) and sub-inspector of Khiri Police Station in Prayagraj forcibly entered the petitioner’s house in March 2026 and detained him without informing the family of the grounds of arrest.

It was alleged that when the petitioner’s family members went to the police station, they found that he was beaten by the police and was in a bad condition.

Following this, a habeas corpus plea was moved before the high court.

According to the state, the petitioner was detained under sections 170 (arrest to prevent commission of cognizable offences), 126 (security for keeping peace in other cases) and 135 (inquiry as to truth of information) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) after he allegedly abused villagers and created an apprehension of breach of peace.

The authorities claimed he could not furnish surety on the day he was produced before the assistant commissioner of police and was therefore sent to judicial custody until March 27, when he furnished a personal bond and was released.

‘Illegal detention’

However, the high court found that the order passed by the assistant commissioner of police on March 19 was a printed proforma that directly sent the petitioner to jail and fixed March 27 as the next date.

The bench noted that there was no recital in the order showing that the petitioner had refused to execute a personal bond on the date of production.

“If petitioner no. 1 did not furnish the personal bond on 19.03.2026, the next date, i.e., 20.03.2026, should have been fixed to provide him an opportunity to furnish personal bond for keeping the peace and maintaining good behaviour. The Assistant Commissioner of Police fixed the next date after eight days; therefore, petitioner no. 1 was kept in illegal detention for eight days, dehors the provisions of law,” the court noted.

Many in custody for up to 20 days

While hearing the matter, the court had also sought data from police commissionerates and judicial authorities regarding detentions under the preventive provisions.

Story continues below this ad

The material placed before it revealed that in the Ghaziabad Commissionerate alone, 2,522 persons were detained under BNSS sections 170, 126 and 135 between May 1, 2025 and April 30, 2026, with periods of custody ranging from one to 17 days. The bench observed that such detentions were not in accordance with the law.

The court further examined records submitted by the chief judicial magistrate, Prayagraj, which showed that 283 people were detained under similar preventive provisions in 2024, 1,321 people in 2025, and 721 people in 2026 till date, adding up to a total of 2,325 people.

According to the bench, many of them remained in custody for periods ranging from a week to as much as 20 days.

‘Shocking state’

Terming the situation in Prayagraj commissionerate a “shocking state of affairs”, the court observed that powers vested in commissioners of police acting as magistrates were being “misused to the hilt”.

Story continues below this ad

It referred to an earlier judgment concerning the Ghaziabad commissionerate, where similar misuse of preventive detention provisions had been noticed.

The court held that the petitioner had been illegally detained for eight days and was therefore entitled to compensation at the rate of Rs 25,000 per day, totalling Rs 2 lakh.

It directed the state government to pay the amount within six weeks and thereafter recover it from the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bara, Prayagraj, after conducting a disciplinary inquiry within three months.

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.

Expertise

Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.

Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:

Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.

Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.

Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:

Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.

Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.

Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

Tags:

allahabad high court

detention