Mark Latham to pay MP $140k over homophobic tweet as appeal fails

Wed 10 Jun 2026 at 11:05am

Wed 10 Jun 2026 at 11:05am

In short:

NSW MP Mark Latham has failed in his bid to overturn a judgement he defamed independent MP Alex Greenwich in a homophobic tweet.

Mr Greenwich had attempted to increase the penalty Mr Latham was ordered to pay in damages, but this appeal was also dismissed.

What's next?

The parties have been directed to confer on costs and are due to return to court next week.

A Federal Court judge has dismissed an appeal against a judgement which ordered New South Wales MP Mark Latham to pay $140,000 to independent MP Alex Greenwich over a homophobic tweet in 2023.

Mr Latham had appealed the determination that he had defamed Mr Greenwich, and the openly gay MP cross-appealed to increase the penalty.

Justice Michael Wheelahan dismissed both appeals and directed the parties to confer on costs and return to court on June 17.

"In this matter, the court has determined to dismiss the appeal and to dismiss the cross appeal," Justice Wheelahan told the court.

The original determination was made in 2024, after Mr Greenwich commenced defamation proceedings.

Justice David O'Callaghan found the tweet, and further comments made by Mr Latham to the Daily Telegraph newspaper, defamed Mr Greenwich, painting him as someone who engaged in "disgusting sexual activities".

Justice O'Callaghan had ordered Mr Latham to pay Mr Greenwich $100,000 for non-economic loss, and a further $40,000 in aggravated damages.

After reviewing the appeals from both sides, Justice Wheelahan determined those orders should remain in place.

Mr Greenwich said the outcome marked the end of a "tough few years".

"More than three years ago, Mr Latham defamed me in a sexually aggressive social media post that subjected me to an avalanche of homophobic hate," he said in a statement.

"Today, justice prevailed: his appeal has been dismissed and the judgement in my favour upheld.

"This is an important judgement at a time when politics is too often charged with divisive vitriol. Like the original judgement and the NCAT ruling, it makes clear there is no place in Australian civil discourse for the kind of conduct Mr Latham engaged in."

Mr Greenwich was also awarded a further $100,000 in April after the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal found Mr Latham unlawfully sexually vilified and sexually harassed him in the same tweet.

Mr Latham has been contacted for comment.