
4 min readNew DelhiJun 13, 2026 11:00 AM IST
Efforts to seek clarification from emigration authorities also proved unsuccessful, leaving her stranded at the airport.
(Image generated using AI)
The district consumer disputes redressal commission, Perambalur, has directed Air India Express to pay Rs 3 lakh in compensation to a young woman after finding that she was wrongly denied boarding on a flight to Kuwait despite holding a valid visa.
A bench comprising president D Jawahar and members P Thilaka and M Muthukumaran observed that the denial of a boarding pass was not only an infringement of her right as a consumer but also an infringement of her fundamental right to travel.
“Complainant and her family members were put to intense menal agony due to deficiencies in service committed by the opposite party and this Commission deem it fit to award a sum of Rs 3,00,000 as compensation for mental agony, considering the enormity of the deficiency in service and the resultant intense mental trauma underwent by her and her family members,” the commission noted in its order dated May 21.
Refused boarding
The complainant, an optometry graduate whose parents are residents of Kuwait, had booked a ticket on a flight from Trichy to Kuwait on September 9, 2023, intending to travel on a dependent visa.
However, when she arrived at the airport, airline officials refused to issue her a boarding pass on the grounds that her visa had expired.
According to the complaint, the passenger repeatedly informed airline staff that her visa remained valid on the date of travel.
Her father also intervened and attempted to explain the position, but the officials allegedly ignored their representations.
Efforts to seek clarification from emigration authorities through email and helpline services also proved unsuccessful, leaving her stranded at the airport.
The airline offered a sum of Rs 20,000 as compensation and a travel voucher worth Rs 10,000, but she was not satisfied with the amount offered and sent a legal notice.
The airline defended its action by contending that, under Kuwaiti immigration rules, a foreign resident’s permit would lapse if the holder remained outside Kuwait for more than six consecutive months.
It argued that the complainant had left Kuwait on March 11, 2023, and was scheduled to return on the 183rd day of her stay abroad, beyond the permissible six-month period.
‘Deficiency in service’
The commission examined documents issued by Kuwait’s ministry of interior and found that the complainant’s residency permit remained valid on September 9, 2023.
It noted that the records showed that the visa was cancelled only on September 12, 2023, three days after her scheduled travel date.
The commission observed that the denial of a boarding pass for an invalid reason is a definite deficiency in service on the part of the airlines.
“If the official had any doubts regarding the validity of the Visa then he or she should have contacted the concerned authority for clarification, but instead, they stood their ground and denied the boarding pass, without valid reason,” the commission remarked in its order.
Story continues below this ad
The commission further pointed out that the airline had refunded a portion of the ticket cost on the very day boarding was denied, indicating that it was aware of the error.
“Even after coming to know that the mistake was on their part, the opposite party did not take any corrective action immediately but waited for the complainant to take further actions,” it added further.
The commission lamented that the complainant was left stranded in the airport, unable to fulfill her dreams and that she and her family were put to intense mental trauma for no fault on their part.
Observing that the complainant and her family members were put to intense mental agony due to deficiencies in service committed by the airlines, the commission awarded Rs 3 lakh as compensation for mental agony, considering the enormity of the deficiency in service and the resultant intense mental trauma undergone by her and her family members.
It further granted Rs 10,000 as costs to the complainant.
Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.
Expertise
Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.
Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:
Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.
Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.
Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:
Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.
Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.
Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More
Tags:
consumer court
View original source — Indian Express ↗
