Forced to spend night in car after hotel denies confirmed room, man wins Rs 10,000

4 min readNew DelhiJun 17, 2026 02:35 PM IST

The complainant alleged that the hotel’s WhatsApp number was non-functional and after contacting another number provided by OYO, the hotel denied having accepted the booking. (AI-generated image)

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ludhiana, has directed OYO Hotels and a Delhi-based hotel to refund Rs 176 and pay Rs 10,000 in costs to a man after he was denied a booked room and allegedly forced to spend the night in his car despite holding a confirmed reservation.

A bench of president Sanjeev Batra and member Monika Bhagat remarked that the act of the opposite parties not only amounted to the adoption of an unfair trade practice but also ran counter to the Indian tradition/belief of “Atithi Devo Bhava”.

“The act and conduct of the OPs not only amounts to adoption of unfair trade practice and rendering of deficiency in service, but also against the Indian tradition/belief of ‘Atithi Devo Bhava‘ (The Guest is GOD) which represents the core philosophy of hospitality and equivalent to respect deeply rooted in Indian Culture,” the bench observed in its order dated May 27.

‘Deficiency in service’

After examining the evidence, the commission noted that the booking was undisputed and that the complainant had been unable to access the reserved accommodation.

It observed that the complainant not only suffered mental agony and harassment due to the indifferent conduct of the opposite parties, but he also had to face embarrassment and inconvenience in front of his near and dear ones.

The commission found that OYO had failed to demonstrate what steps, if any, were taken to assist the complainant when he encountered difficulties at the hotel.

OYO did not spell out the proactive steps it had taken when the complainant encountered difficulties in securing the booked room with Yatari Palace, it observed, adding that the hotel too did not provide any assistance to the complainant and rather shut its doors to the complainant and his associates.

The commission held the opposite parties liable for unfair trade practice and deficiency in service.

It partly allowed the complaint and ordered the opposite parties to jointly and severally refund Rs 176 paid by the complainant and pay Rs 10,000 as composite costs within 30 days.

Booked hotel room, slept in car

According to the complaint, the man had booked a room at Yatari Palace, a hotel listed on OYO’s platform, for a stay between January 17 and 18, 2023. The complainant stated that OYO provided him with a booking ID, which was confirmed and partly paid for.

However, when the complainant and his companions reached the hotel at around 1.30 am on January 18, they were unable to check in.

He alleged that the hotel’s WhatsApp number was non-functional and that, after contacting another number provided by OYO’s customer care, the hotel denied having accepted the booking through OYO.

The complainant stated that, with no accommodation available at that hour, he and his companions had to spend the remainder of the night in their car before eventually receiving temporary shelter from a nearby hotel. He claimed that repeated representations, including a legal notice and an email complaint, elicited no response from the service providers.

Story continues below this ad

OYO contested the complaint, arguing that it merely operates a technology platform connecting guests with hotels.

The company maintained that its records showed a valid booking and denied receiving any formal complaint regarding check-in difficulties. It further contended that the complainant had failed to produce evidence supporting allegations of deficiency in service.

OYO submitted that if the complainant had reached their executive, he would have been duly assisted and his grievance would have been redressed.

Takeaway

The ruling emphasises that online hotel booking platforms and their partner hotels cannot evade responsibility when a confirmed reservation is not honoured. The commission reinforced that consumers are entitled to the accommodation they have booked, and service providers must have effective mechanisms to assist customers when bookings fail.

Story continues below this ad

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact consumer helpline in their respective states (Chandigarh helpline: 0172-2700183) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.

Expertise

Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.

Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:

Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.

Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.

Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:

Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.

Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.

Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

Tags:

consumer court

ludhiana

Oyo Hotels