Realtor gets 2 years’ jail, fine for defying order to refund Rs 2 lakh to plot buyer

5 min readNew DelhiJun 18, 2026 04:00 PM IST

The commission, therefore, convicted the accused under the Consumer Protection Act and noted that no lenient view could be taken as the complainant was deprived of his money. (AI-generated image)

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Punjab’s SAS Nagar (Mohali) has sentenced the president of a real estate welfare society to two years’ imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh for failing to comply with a 2019 order directing the refund of Rs 2.12 lakh to a plot purchaser.

A bench of president S K Aggarwal and member Lt Col Jasbir Singh Bath noted that no plausible explanation or justification was given by the accused for not complying with the order passed way back in 2019.

“The very purpose and object of enactment of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 will be frustrated if the orders passed by this Commission are not being complied with by the accused,” the commission observed in its order dated June 15.

Refund order, non-compliance

Earlier, the complainant had filed a plea before the commission seeking a refund for the alleged failure of the developer to hand over possession.

The plea was allowed on March 5, 2019, directing the society to refund Rs 2,12,500 with 12 per cent annual interest from the dates of deposit, besides paying Rs 25,000 as compensation for mental agony and harassment and Rs 5,000 towards litigation costs.

The order had further directed that payment of the amount of compensation and litigation expenses be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.

The commission noted, however, that the accused did not comply with its 2019 order.

The complainant filed another complaint before the commission under Section 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, for a direction to the accused to comply with the order.

During the proceedings, the accused stated that the society was prepared to offer possession of an available plot subject to payment of the balance amount, along with charges for infrastructure development and external development under the agreement.

The commission, however, noted that he neither complied with the refund order nor produced any defence evidence.

Conviction and sentencing

The commission noted that the purpose of the Consumer Protection Act will be defeated if its orders are not complied with.

“We have gone through the file and have come to the conclusion that the very purpose and object of enactment of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 will be frustrated if the orders passed by this Commission are not being complied with by the accused,” the commission noted.

It reiterated Section 72 of the Act, which provides for a penalty for non-compliance with an order.

Section 72 states that whoever fails to comply with any order made by the district commission or the state commission or the national commission, as the case may be, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one month, but which may extend to three years or with a fine.

Story continues below this ad

The fine shall not be less than 25,000 rupees, but may extend to 1 lakh rupees. The commission lamented that the order was passed way back in 2019.

“No plausible explanation or justification has been shown by the accused for not complying with the order passed way back in the year 2019. Now we are in 2026. People like the complainant are crying but the accused is not complying with the orders of this Commission,” it said.

The commission, therefore, convicted the accused under Section 72 and observed that no lenient view could be taken towards the man as the complainant was deprived of his money due to the act of the accused. It directed him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years with a fine of Rs 1 lakh.

It further ordered that in case of default of payment of fine, the accused will further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.

Story continues below this ad

The commission directed that Rs 50,000 out of the fine be paid to the complainant, while the remaining Rs 50,000 would be credited to the state exchequer.

Takeaway

A consumer commission’s refund order is not merely advisory, as failure to comply can lead to consequences under the Consumer Protection Act.

Consumers facing grievances may contact their respective state consumer helplines (Chandigarh helpline: 1800 300 11 007) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.

Expertise

Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.

Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:

Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.

Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.

Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:

Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.

Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.

Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

Tags:

consumer court

mohali

real estate