Gujarat HC quashes 2019 FIR against advocate in attempt-to-murder case

5 min readAmedabadUpdated: Jun 21, 2026 10:03 PM IST

In the FIR, the complainant, Asaraf Shaikh, alleged that on December 10, 2019, he had gone to the Surat court to meet one of his friends who was to be brought there by the police. (Representational)

The Gujarat High Court has quashed an FIR registered in 2019 against an advocate after CCTV footage collected during the investigation proved the claim of the complainant wrong regarding the presence of the accused at a Surat court at a particular time.

The Court of Justice P M Raval passed an order in this regard on June 19, acting on a petition moved by the advocate, Mohammed Bilal Kagazi, who was named as an accused in the case.

The FIR in question was registered with Rander Police Station of Surat in 2019 for offences under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including 307 (attempt to murder), 326 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means), 143 (unlawful assembly), 147 (rioting), 506(2) (criminal intimidation) and 120(b) (criminal conspiracy).

Apart from the petitioner’s advocate, the FIR named several other persons as accused.

In the FIR, the complainant, Asaraf Shaikh, alleged that on December 10, 2019, he had gone to the Surat court to meet one of his friends who was to be brought there by the police. It was alleged that when Shaikh and his friends were standing in the passage on the third floor of the sessions court around 10 am, Kagazi came to them and threatened them to withdraw another criminal case registered by them earlier.

On learning about the registration of FIR against him, Kagazi made a representation to the police while raising various contentions, ‘more particularly’ about his absence at the third floor of the court at around 10 am, as mentioned in the FIR.

Eventually, concerned CCTC footage of the court was collected, which showed that the accused (advocate) was not present there at 10 am as alleged.

Story continues below this ad

With a prayer to quash the FIR against Kagazi, his advocate at HC, Kashyap Joshi, argued before the court that the former has been wrongly implicated in the FIR by the complainant with an ulterior motive that he could not appear for other accused persons in the case.

Prosecution had opposed the petition while stating, among other things, that when the charge of criminal conspiracy has been invoked, it has to be tested during trial. The additional public prosecutor argued that there was enough material collected during the investigation to bring on record the complicity of the applicant in the case, like him staying in contact with other accused before the alleged incident.

Eventually, the court ordered to quash the FIR against Kagazi while observing in its judgment, “…the fact remains that when present applicant came to know that his name is also surfaced in the FIR, he immediately rushed to the police commissioner as well as the concerned investigation officer of Rander police station, Surat, contending that he has been falsely implicated. This fact is fortified from the fact that after the interference of the Hon’ble High Court, the investigating agency could lay their hands on the CCTV footage where the present applicant is not found ‘present’ in the passage/balcony on the third floor of the court. Therefore, the very initiation of the FIR on the ground that the present applicant threatened the complainant at 10:00 O’clock, when he was present to meet his friend…who was to be brought by the police party, is falsified.”

“It is relevant to note that this Court would be no(t) keen to enter into conducting the mini trial, however, when the specific case of alibi has been raised by the present applicant and the CCTV footages…falsify the claim of the complainant having talked with the applicant at 10:00 O’clock in the passage on the third floor of the District Court Surat. The present exercise has been undertaken to see that no innocent person is wrongly implicated,” it added.

Story continues below this ad

Negating some other issues raised by the prosecution and while quashing the FIR against Kagazi, the court observed, “…having found that present applicant was not present at the scene of offence and was also not visible at the District Court, Surat, as alleged by the complainant from the CCTV footage, the said aspect would itself demolish the very basis of the FIR against the present applicant which can be evaluated even at the stage of quashing as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Sajal Bose vs. State of West Bengal and others.”

The court eventually ordered to quash the FIR against the advocate while also noting the absence of any corroborative material against him and the material relied upon by the investigating agency itself falsifying the case of the prosecution.

The complainant in the case remained absent in the court, though a notice was served on him.

© The Indian Express Pvt Ltd

Parimal A Dabhi works with The Indian Express as Chief of Bureau, focusing on the state of Gujarat. Leveraging his seniority and access, Dabhi is recognized for his reporting on the complex interplay of law, politics, social justice, and governance within the region.

Expertise & Authority

Core Authority (Social Justice and Law): Dabhi is a key source for in-depth coverage of caste-based violence, discrimination, and the state's response to social movements, particularly those involving Patidar, Dalit and OBC communities. His reporting focuses on the societal and legal fallout of these issues:

Caste and Discrimination: He has reported extensively on social boycotts and instances of violence against Dalits (such as the attack on a Dalit wedding party in Patan), the community's demands (like refusing to pick carcasses), and the political responses from leaders like Jignesh Mevani.

Judicial and Legal Affairs: He tracks significant, high-stakes legal cases and judgments that set precedents in Gujarat, including the convictions under the stringent Gujarat Animal Preservation Act (cow slaughter), 2002 Gujarat riots and developments in cases involving former police officers facing charges of wrongful confinement and fake encounters.

Political and Administrative Oversight: Dabhi provides essential coverage of the inner workings of the state government and the opposition, ensuring a high degree of Trustworthiness in political analysis:

State Assembly Proceedings: He frequently reports directly from the Gujarat Assembly, covering Question Hour, discussion on various Bills, debates on budgetary demands for departments like Social Justice, and ministerial statements on issues like illegal mining, job quotas for locals, and satellite-based farm loss surveys.

Electoral Politics: His work details key political developments, including election analysis (voter turnout records), party organizational changes (like the end of C R Patil’s tenure as BJP chief), and campaign dynamics. ... Read More

Tags:

Gujrat High Court