There is a wry but disturbing joke now making the rounds among some political analysts

There is a wry but disturbing joke now making the rounds among some political analysts: in the 2028 Philippine presidential election, the real winner may not be any Filipino political party, coalition, or candidate. It may be the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Like many dark jokes, it works because it exaggerates a fear that already exists. It should not be treated as a proven fact. There is no publicly conclusive evidence that China can simply decide who becomes president of the Philippines. Filipino voters are not puppets. Philippine elections, for all their distortions, still contain real passions, grievances, memories, loyalties, and judgments.

But the joke should not be dismissed either. It points to a strategic vulnerability that the country has not yet fully confronted: foreign interference no longer needs to look like ballot-rigging, invasion, or a suitcase of cash handed to a candidate. It can look like money routed through consultants, anonymous digital amplification, political advertising disguised as issue advocacy, troll farms attacking sovereignty advocates, civic groups building influence in local communities, and narratives that slowly train voters to think that defending the West Philippine Sea is reckless, elitist, or “pro-American.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The possibility that China may seek to shape the 2028 elections must be examined in this wider sense. Not as a conspiracy theory, but as a democratic-security problem. The historical context is unavoidable. Former President Rodrigo Duterte’s 2016 victory was followed by a dramatic softening of the Philippine position toward China. The Philippines had just won its historic arbitral victory over China’s sweeping claims in the South China Sea. Yet instead of using that ruling as the centerpiece of a sustained diplomatic campaign, the Duterte administration largely set it aside in favor of accommodation, infrastructure promises, and a declared “independent foreign policy” that often looked less independent than deferential.

FEATURED STORIES

OPINION

OPINION

OPINION

Former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario later alleged that China had interfered in the 2016 elections to help Duterte win. Duterte and China denied this. The allegation remains publicly unproven. But even without accepting it as fact, the strategic lesson is clear: Beijing benefited enormously from having a Philippine president who downplayed the arbitral ruling, questioned the value of the American alliance, and framed resistance to China as a path to war.

That is why 2028 matters so much. Vice President Sara Duterte is widely expected to be a formidable presidential contender. Like her father, she speaks the language of friendship with all countries and avoidance of conflict. It allows her to appear patriotic while leaving open the possibility of restoring a more China-accommodating foreign policy.

The danger is not that VP Sara will run as “China’s candidate.” Soft capture works this way: Elections remain formally democratic. Voters still line up, shade ballots, and choose. But the information environment is manipulated. Fear is amplified. Anger is redirected. Sovereignty advocates are portrayed as warmongers. The United States is framed as the hidden puppeteer behind every Philippine maritime assertion. China is recast not as an aggressor in Philippine waters but as a permanent neighbor offering trade, peace, and stability. The arbitral ruling becomes “just paper.” Fishermen’s rights become a secondary issue. National defense becomes an elite distraction from inflation and corruption.

Article continues after this advertisement

This kind of influence operation succeeds best when it rides on real domestic frustrations. Many Filipinos are tired of dynasties, corruption, poverty, and elite hypocrisy. Many distrust Washington as much as Beijing. Many fear war. Many remember Rodrigo Duterte not through foreign policy analysis, but through feelings of order, directness, and vengeance against an arrogant establishment. These sentiments are not invented by China. But they can be exploited by China.

That is the hardest part to confront. The correct response is institutional seriousness. Campaign finance must be audited for foreign-linked money routed through intermediaries. Digital platforms must disclose political advertising and coordinated inauthentic behavior. The Commission on Elections, Anti-Money Laundering Council, Department of Information and Communications Technology, Department of Foreign Affairs, National Security Council, and law enforcement must coordinate early, not after the damage is done. Journalists and researchers tracking influence operations must be protected. Candidates should be pressed to disclose their foreign-policy advisers, major consultants, and donors.

The question for 2028 is not simply who wins Malacañang. It is whether the Filipino people can still choose their leaders in an information environment that is genuinely their own. The CCP does not need to own a Philippine party to win. It only needs enough Filipinos to believe that sovereignty is too expensive to defend. That is why the joke is not funny.

Article continues after this advertisement

—————————————

[email protected]

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.