
MANILA, Philippines — The defense team of Vice President Sara Duterte asserted on Tuesday that it has enough manpower for the marking of evidence in the pretrial conference for the vice president’s impeachment trial.
It also observed that it is the prosecution who ‘lack personnel.’
These statements come after the House prosecution panel requested the defense to deploy additional teams to participate in the pretrial conference.
Article continues after this advertisement
“It was actually the private prosecutors who lacked the personnel to mark the exhibits,” defense lawyer Mark Vinluan told the media.
FEATURED STORIES
NEWSINFO
NEWSINFO
NEWSINFO
“Maybe Representative [Gerville] Luistro just doesn’t understand much because they don’t participate all day,” he noted.
He added: “They just appear in the morning, then they leave, and they leave the rest of the task to the private prosecutors who are handling the case.”
READ: Luistro, Poa admit: Pre-trial not yet near its ending
With the pretrial only two days away from its scheduled end date, Vinluan suggested that it would help if Luistro and the other public prosecutors are marking the documents as well.
Article continues after this advertisement
“Personally, for me it will contribute if they are there because [the prosecution] will have additional manpower,” Vinluan explained.
However, the defense team’s spokesperson Michael Poa insisted that with or without the public prosecution’s presence, he “doesn’t see any difference.”
Article continues after this advertisement
“Let’s not make a big fuss out of that,” he said, referring to the number of lawyers in each team marking evidence.
Poa pointed out once again that the volume of the documents being marked is extending the pretrial beyond what both sides expected.
“In the interest of fairness, it’s not just the defense or the prosecution, because both sides have many documents,” he added.
READ: Defense refuses House prosecutors’ ‘common markings’ request in pretrial
The pretrial has reached its third day, but both the prosecution and the defense have yet to finish marking their evidence for two of the four Articles of Impeachment.
These are Articles I and II referring to Duterte’s alleged misuse of confidential funds, and accumulation of unexplained wealth.
Article III and IV were already tackled on the first day of pretrial.
Article III covers Duterte’s supposed bribery on Department of Education officials, while Article IV refers to the alleged threats of the vice president against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez. /apl
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.
View original source — Philippine Daily Inquirer ↗


