Left stranded at Delhi Airport, Haj couple secures Rs 62,000 payout from SpiceJet

5 min readNew DelhiJun 25, 2026 09:00 AM IST

The commission found that the couple was forced to spend the night at Delhi airport with no alternative flights available at that time. (AI-generated image)

A Srinagar consumer commission has directed SpiceJet to refund the ticket cost of Rs 10,078 and pay Rs 52,000 as compensation after a couple returning from the Haj pilgrimage was allegedly denied boarding despite having valid boarding passes and had to spend the night at Delhi airport.

President Dr Farah Deeba and Shabnum Munshi (member) found that the complainant was forced to book another flight from Indigo the next early morning at a higher rate of Rs 13,450.

“The opposite party (SpiceJet) is held liable not only for being deficient in service but also for adopting unfair trade practice towards the complainant. It is also acknowledged that due to such action of the opposite party, the complainant has suffered immense mental pain, agony, harassment and financial loss,” the June 9 order read.

The commission was hearing the complaint filed by one Ghulam Nabi Fafoo, who along with his wife was denied boarding despite having valid boarding passes and checking in on time in July 224.

Forced to spend night at Delhi airport after Haj

The case of the complainant was that he and his wife, namely Raja Begum, were returning from the Haj Pilgrimage on July 8, 2024 and were travelling from Delhi to Srinagar.

It was stated that the son of the complainant had booked air tickets for the complainant and his wife from the airline SpiceJet, scheduled departure of 6:45 pm at Delhi and arrival time of 8:20 pm at Srinagar airport.

It was further added that accordingly, the complainant along with his wife reached New Delhi Airport well on time prior to scheduled departure and after obtaining the boarding pass handed over the luggage to the officials of SpiceJet and waited at the boarding gate for boarding the flight. It was contended that as soon as the boarding started, the complainant and his wife reached the boarding gate with the boarding passes.

Story continues below this ad

However, it was alleged that despite reaching the boarding gate with valid boarding passes, they were not allowed to board the aircraft. The complainant allegedly sought an explanation, but the airline staff failed to provide any reason.

The complainant further alleged that “blue-eyed persons” were accommodated on the flight in their place and that their boarding passes were cancelled by the airline.

It was contended that the luggage of the complainant and his wife was returned after a couple of hours late in the night and there was no flight from Delhi to Srinagar available then.

As a result, the complainant and his wife were allegedly forced to spend the night in the airport, causing discomfort and mental agony.

Story continues below this ad

Thereafter, it was contended that the complainant and his wife were compelled to book an early morning flight of Indigo Airlines at a higher rate from Delhi to Srinagar. The complainant maintained that SpiceJet has subjected him to immense pain, agony, harassment and financial loss, hence filed this complaint.

The complainant was represented by advocate N A Shalla in the matter.

‘SpiceJet deficient of service’

The consumer body found that even after obtaining boarding passes and handing over their luggage, the complainant and his wife were denied boarding for reasons best known to the airline.

It found that with no alternative flights available, the couple was forced to spend the night at Delhi airport.

The commission held that the conduct of the airline amounted not only to deficiency in service but also to an unfair trade practice.

The commission noted that SpiceJet failed to appear and also to take any step in reference to the complaint at hand.

The commission directed SpiceJet to refund the cost of air tickets amounting to Rs 10,078 purchased by the complainant for their travel from Delhi to Srinagar.

The airline was also directed to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation for subjecting the complainant and his wife to immense pain, agony, harassment and financial loss.

The commission lastly ordered Spice Jet to pay Rs 2,000 as litigation charges to the complainant.

Object of Consumer Protection Act

The consumer body held that the object of the Consumer Protection Act, 1987 is to provide for better protection of the interests of the consumer and, as such, to settle the consumer disputes quickly in a summary proceeding.

It was added that the aim of the Act is also to ward off the ordeals of an aggrieved consumer which he is likely to suffer while seeking an ordinary remedy in the form of a regular civil case.

It was pointed out that the linchpin of the Act is to promote the welfare of the society market economy.

Significance of ruling

This ruling underscores that airlines cannot deny boarding to passengers who have complied with all travel formalities and then leave them stranded without explanation. Such conduct may amount to both deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, entitling consumers to compensation for the inconvenience and financial loss suffered.

Consumer helpline number of respective state and national consumer commission: For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states (Jammu and Kashmir Consumer Commission Helpline: 1800 180 7114) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape.

Expertise

Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen.

Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on:

Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy.

Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

Tags:

Consumer dispute Redressal Commission

SpiceJet aircraft