Olivia Wilde Says Her Last Movie’s 38% Rotten Tomatoes Score ‘Liberated’ Her to Make ‘The Invite’ and Gives Her Take on…

Olivia Wilde did almost everything you are not supposed to do to make “The Invite.”

She shot her third feature as a director in a tight 21 days, scene by scene, in story order, which is a luxury most directors give up before the first morning of prep work. She also got to shoot it on film. Not to mention, the entire premise of the film is confined to a single San Francisco apartment, which allowed her to rehearse it like a play, asking her cast to work for nothing for six weeks so the experiment could hold together.

The result is a claustrophobic chamber comedy that locks two couples inside one home, unfolding into a wild night they will never forget. And when the offers came in after the splashy premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, Wilde knew one thing about where the movie would not go.

“Every distributor wanted to take this movie to theaters, and I was adamant that we didn’t go to a streamer,” she tells Variety. “From all the non-streamers, they all wanted to put it in a theater. That’s a really good sign for everyone.”

It is a pointed stance from a filmmaker who has watched the streaming giants reshape the Hollywood business, and she frames it as part of a larger shift she sees breaking in favor of independent film. The box office is climbing, she argues, on the strength of the exact audience the platforms wrote off. The generation that was counted out – Gen Z – is showing up, embracing authorship and rejecting the idea that young viewers will only watch at home.

If Wilde sounds liberated, it is because she has already lived through the version of failure that could paralyze most directors. Her 2019 indie comedy “Booksmart” received near-unanimous raves. Then came her 2022 drama “Don’t Worry Darling,” which took a beating from critics and the public. She embraces that pendulum swing as the best thing that could have happened to her.

“I believe in early failure,” she says. “If you go through that, the way ‘Don’t Worry Darling’ did with a 38% on Rotten Tomatoes, there’s liberation.”

That freedom and philosophy have seemed to run straight through “The Invite,” a movie she made by chasing process over outcome and surrounding herself with collaborators willing to attempt the impossible on a compressed schedule.

Production designer Jade Healy conjured the apartment, a labyrinth of walls, and frames within frames and “Rear Window” sightlines, in a single weekend. Costume designer Arianne Phillips dyed Wilde’s blouse to match the walls so her character would all but vanish into the home she sacrificed her ambitions to keep. And her scene-partner Seth Rogen, in what Wilde calls a career peak, delivers a performance she compares to Albert Brooks and 1980s Richard Dreyfuss, alongside Edward Norton and Penelope Cruz.

The A24-distributed film is also, beneath the comedy, a study of what unhappy couples project onto the people they wish they had married, a structural sleight of hand Wilde is happy to unpack for anyone who caught it.

On a Zoom with Variety, she talks about the gamble of shooting in sequence, the apartment that became a fifth character, the streamer fight she refused to lose, and the moment she knew Rogen was doing his best work.

SPOILER ALERT: This Q&A contains spoilers for “The Invite,” now playing in select theaters.

“Booksmart” came out of the gate to raves, and “Don’t Worry Darling” took a beating. Did this one feel like you finally got the nerves out as a director?

I’m so glad it felt that way. I don’t know if anyone ever feels totally without nerves. Still, I do think I reached a level of un-self-consciousness that only comes from recognizing that the only way to achieve anything worthwhile is to throw yourself into it completely. The risk is the thing. It is the reward.

I believe in early failure. The first pilot I did got canceled in three episodes. There were a lot of early bumps, and I think that taught me to have level-headed expectations for Hollywood. “Booksmart” was a blessing, but it also creates a certain expectation for yourself when it comes to connecting with the audience, and you forget how subjective it all is. So my next movie has a 38 on Rotten Tomatoes, and I’ve been reflecting on how healthy it is to be reminded of how fickle it all is. You’ve already been through the thing that strikes fear in the heart of directors. What if they don’t like it? Once you’ve survived that, there’s liberation.

You shot the film in 21 days. Is it true you shot it sequentially?

It’s not a rumor, it’s the truth. Twenty-one days on the stage, and then two days on location for the footage you see in the opening title sequence.

How, and why?

For a long time, I’ve been looking for a piece of material that would allow for this experience of shooting something sequentially. And not only that, having time to rehearse the damn thing, which, as everybody who’s ever made a movie knows, is the first thing we give away. It’s amazing how much of what you see in films is the first pancake. People go for it, and I have mad respect for those who nail that. But I’ve always wondered what it would be like if we built in time to marinate this thing.

That’s what the directors I revere have always done. Mike Nichols’ “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” was my north star. I wanted to approach this like a play. Rehearse, shoot it sequentially, because we were only on one set, and shoot it on film, which was the third dream. But it took the actors’ cooperation because I needed them fully engaged in the process. In this movie, they were making $0 for six weeks. When you’re working with busy actors, you often get a cluster of days here and a cluster there, and you end up blocking shooting and Rubik’s Cubing your production. I wanted everyone to be part of every step of the process, from rehearsal through the end of the shoot, and this cast was incredibly gracious with their time and energy.

Let’s talk about the ending, because I have a theory. The way it’s cut, the abrupt stop and start, I read it that the other couple was never actually there. Am I correct?

[Hands raised to celebrate] That is my interpretation, and that was the intention. Do you know which scene breaks the rule? There’s a moment where Hawk goes into the bathroom, and he’s alone at the medicine cabinet. Otherwise, you never experience those characters without the presence of Joe and Angela.

I love that you felt it, because to me, it works both ways. This couple reaches a point of combustion in an early argument, when they finally say the word that triggers the projection of the other two: “miserable.” There’s something about admitting unhappiness that is a game-changer. We can go a long time with dissatisfaction expressed only through passive aggression and barbs, but when someone looks you in the face and says, “I am miserable in this relationship,” that is often the point at which you either fix it or fail.

We project these people who teach us a lesson. They are, in many ways, the ideal partners we could imagine for ourselves. But imagining the ideal other is part of understanding what you actually want and deserve. There are little clues if you look back. Should people appear in mirrors when they don’t? Are there wine glasses? Tiny things. It also works if you don’t buy that at all.

This may be Seth Rogen’s finest moment as an actor. Thank God someone saw what he could do.

That means so much to me because I revere Seth. He’s not only smart in how he writes and creates, and smart in the way any great actor is, but he also has a connection to the audience’s experience unlike anything I’ve ever witnessed. He knows in his bones when an audience is underserved or over-served. He brings everything down to its simplest form. He never overcomplicates. He is allergic to pretentious approaches to anything.

In this movie, we get to show the side of him that comes from reaching a kind of Albert Brooks or 1980s Richard Dreyfuss place. There’s a quality to him that is not of this time. And he makes everyone in a scene better. He’s just extraordinary.

The production design floored me. The house is a fifth character. Tell me about Jade Healy.

Jade is extraordinary, and right away, she understood what one location can actually be. She understood that, though it’s one apartment, it can feel like a labyrinth, with several small spaces. She designed the whole set over one weekend. I talked to her on a Thursday, and by Monday, she had a full design.

She said we’re going to create frames within frames, using the architecture as emotional blocks, barriers, and boundaries between people. The mirrors, the glass, the windows. She figured out that a tight airshaft design could provide additional vantage points, so a character witnesses something in a very intentional “Rear Window”-style, voyeuristic way through a window into the other apartment.

In the original script, the house was an open floor plan. The idea was that there was nowhere to hide. We changed that. We created hiding places, hallways, offices, corners and bedrooms so the foursome could split into two and have what we called the house tours, two little rendezvous happening concurrently. Jade created a space where you feel the danger of proximity to your partner, but also the privacy to have secret conversations. Once you know the space you’re going to exist in, you can tell the story specific to what that space allows.

The house inspired me as a character representing the home Joe grew up in, far beyond his current financial means, with the bones of an expensive house and the skin of people living right on the edge.

I want to give a shout-out to our cinematographer, Adam Newport-Berra, because he is on a real run right now. He and his crew are extraordinary. That is the most exciting DP working today, and you can see it in “The Invite.”

And Steve Morrow, our sound mixer. The second time we worked together, I told him I wanted everyone to speak like we were in a Robert Altman film. I wanted us to improvise, and I never wanted anyone told to hold a line for someone else’s line. He is live-mixing the whole thing, and it’s such a thrill when audiences say they like how natural it feels when everyone is speaking, even with the overlapping dialogue. That’s so much a part of what I think works.

Your character, Angela, almost disappears into the walls.

That was intentional. Thanks to Arianne Phillips, our costume designer, who dyed my blouse to match the walls perfectly. It creates an almost subconscious effect of Angela having little to no identity beyond this home. She gave up the dream of being an artist to raise a family and be a homemaker, so much of her life lost to the surface of things, the throw pillows and the lamps, because she was unable to go deeper.

Distributors came calling after the festival. What was your line in the sand?

Every distributor wanted to take this movie to theaters, and I was adamant that we didn’t go to a streamer. Of all the non-streamers, they all really wanted to put it in a theater. I think that’s a really good sign for everyone.

People are unsure about the industry for good reason, with everything happening with AI and in the world. But something really positive is happening too. We’re seeing it at the box office: a 30% upswing driven by the generation the big streaming giants counted out. They said Gen Z doesn’t want to watch films in theaters, and we’re seeing an outright rejection of that and an embracing of authorship. What we’re seeing is the triumph of independent film, independent studios, and independent companies saying, “We’re going to approach this differently.” There is an appetite for theatrical films and comedies. Audiences are very motivated to support independent filmmakers, and that’s a good thing for all of us.