Hunt for insights that can transform your business

Data is one of the most overvalued commodities in modern business.

We are currently drowning in statistics, yet many organizations are starving for insight. Data tells you what happened; observation tells you how it happened. But only an insight tells you why it happened in a way that allows you to transform the future.

To find it, one must move beyond intellectual laziness and the Law of Foolish Fellowship, that dangerous tendency to follow industry rules simply because that’s how it has always been done.

Article continues after this advertisement

The architecture of reasoning: The Pila stack

In the Pila (Problem, Insight, Logic, Assumptions) reasoning stack, I or Insight is the strategic engine. However, an engine cannot start without fuel. That fuel is a clearly defined problem (P).

FEATURED STORIES

BUSINESS

BUSINESS

BUSINESS

The “stack” nature of PILA is a hierarchy of intellectual labor. You cannot find a transformative insight if you had not first isolated a substantive problem.

Most leaders fail at the insight stage because they are solving the wrong problem or a symptom masquerading as one.

A clearly defined problem—one that identifies a specific, painful friction in the consumer’s life—is the only way to find an insight that matters. Once the problem is identified, the insight reveals the “why” behind the struggle, allowing the firm to offer a tradeoff for the better.

To master this, you must adopt a specific strategic flow: PILA → I.N.S.I.G.H.T.S. → S.C.A.R.

Article continues after this advertisement

You start with the reasoning stack to structure thinking, use the hunting framework to find the unmasked truth and apply the stress test to ensure that the strategy has the teeth to disrupt the market

The I.N.S.I.G.H.T.S. Hunting Framework

Insight is the unmasking of a future truth. It is the discovery of an actionable friction that everyone else has accepted as “normal.”

Article continues after this advertisement

I–Inconsistencies and inversions

Inconsistencies are “normalcy violations” where data and human behavior misalign. For years, the Mansmith Market Masters Conference included a lavish free lunch. We noticed a contradiction: participants were sluggish in the afternoon, often preferring to walk around the mall and hunt for their own food.

By inverting the rule and removing the lunch (except for sponsors and super VIPs), we gained a more attentive audience and cut costs. We took inversion further with the “UnConference” format, killing the Holy Trinity of PowerPoints, audio-visual presentations and long-winded speeches to create a high-value engagement model.

N–Negative space (Low penetration)

Most companies study their customers; few study their “refusers.” If penetration is low, a systemic barrier is being ignored. For our provincial delegates, the cost of flights and hotels was a massive friction. The insight that accessibility shouldn’t be a luxury led to our fully online versions at inclusive price points.

S–Strategic sabotage (Competitor strengths)

The goal is to turn a competitor’s asset into an “anchor-weight.” Before Waters Philippines launched its pioneering network marketing system, the industry had been dominated by a multinational giant with over 20 branches nationwide and a large fleet for door-to-door sales. We saw this “strength” becoming a liability in an era of condominium living, rising safety concerns and women working. We pivoted to a high-trust model that made their expensive physical infrastructure look slow and risky.

I–Industry cross-pollination

Strategy is often a tradeoff common in one industry but revolutionary in another. We borrowed the “unli” (unlimited service) logic from telecommunications and fast food, proving that superior logic chains are portable if you have the courage to transplant them.

G–Gaps and wish lists

Listen for the phrase, “I wish they would just …” While known initially for intimate seminars, we heard a wish for recognition, leading to the Mansmith Awards. We filled the gap for a trusted awarding system in marketing, sales and innovation, solving the “validation friction.”

H–Human barriers (5 whys)

Peeling back layers reveals root frictions. Why don’t more people join industry awards? Cost. Why is it expensive? They are seen as profit centers. To maximize trust, we removed the “pay-to-play” barrier, eliminating all entry and guest fees, a deliberate sacrifice to solidify authority.

T–Targeted outliers (Extreme users)

Demanding clients are your best research and development department. Solving a pharma CEO’s unique challenges forced us to develop the “math of ethical pharma promoting,” a framework later adopted by other players in the industry.

S – Subconscious fixes (Workarounds)

Watch where users “hack” a solution. We saw students photocopying expensive foreign textbooks, a workaround for a broken pricing model.

We responded with high-quality books in a Philippine setting and a buy-one- give-one program to public schools, addressing this microfrustration.

The tradeoff logic: Strategy is sacrifice

The “tradeoff for the better” means the firm has the courage to say: “We will stop trying to be everything to everyone.” If there is no sacrifice, there is no strategy, only improvement. Strategy is about being different so your competitor becomes irrelevant.

A real insight must do more than conform to expectations. It is superior only if it transforms the nature of competition.

This requires cultural literacy, the ability to decode unspoken frustrations. Many leaders settle for “safe” information that merely validates current production lines, but a transformative insight reveals that the customer is currently making a painful sacrifice of time, money or peace of mind.

The final audit: Does your insight have S.C.A.R.?

Once hunted, an insight must pass the S.C.A.R. stress test. If it doesn’t leave a mark on your profit and loss or operational model, it isn’t strategy—it’s just a suggestion.

S–Sacrifice: What profitable but friction-heavy activity are you stopping? (e.g., zero-fee awards).

C–Contralogic: Does it defy industry “best practices”? (e.g., No more conference lunch).

A–Actionable friction: Does it solve a specific “bleed” point for the consumer? (e.g., Replacing expensive foreign texts with high-quality, local books to end the student “hack” of illegal photocopying).

R–Result-oriented logic: Does it drive a strategic shift in your Pila stack? (e.g., Pivoting to high-trust network marketing to turn a competitor’s massive physical infrastructure into a slow, expensive liability).

The mandate for leadership

Stop looking for data that validates the past. Start looking for insights that unmask the future.

In the Trust Economy, the mandate is clear: Don’t just solve a problem; own the solution by rewriting the rules of the game.

Finding an insight isn’t about a creative “spark.” It’s about the discipline to hunt for frictions others are too “professional” to mention.

When you move from conforming to transforming, you stop playing for profit and start playing for market ownership.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

If you refuse the intellectual labor of the PILA stack, your decline is a certainty. You are either driving the market or you are being driven by it. —Contributed INQ