‘Right to life on higher pedestal’: Court protects couple despite groom being below 21

4 min readNew DelhiUpdated: Jul 3, 2026 10:33 AM IST

Observing that the right to life stands on a much higher pedestal regardless of whether a citizen is a minor or an adult, the Allahabad High Court recently granted protection to a couple allegedly facing threats and harassment from the woman’s father after she married a man who is below the marriageable age.

Justice Dr Gautam Chowdhary noted that the mere fact that the husband was not of marriageable age in the present case would not deprive him of his fundamental right under Constitution of India, being a citizen of India.

“The writ petition is finally disposed off with the direction that the petitioners are at liberty to live together being a married couple and no person shall be permitted to interfere in their peaceful living,” the order dated July 1.

The court directed the couple to register their marriage within two months under the U.P. Marriage Registration Rules, 2017, failing which the protection granted by the order would automatically cease.

Justice Dr Gautam Chowdhary permitted the couple to live together. (Image generated using AI)

Plea for protection

The counsel appearing on behalf of the couple submitted that the woman was aged about 23 years, as her date of birth recorded in the Aadhar card and the man was aged about 20 years.

It was further submitted that although the husband was a major, he had not attained the marriageable age as prescribed under the Hindu Marriage Act.

The counsel further informed the court that the woman had conceived and that their family members have got annoyed therefore there was serious danger to their lives as they were being threatened and harassed.

Story continues below this ad

The State opposed the petition, contending that since the husband had not attained the marriageable age prescribed under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the marriage was void under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and therefore prayed for the dismissal of the plea.

Court comes to the aid

The court noted that Section 12 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 declares a child marriage void in circumstances such as kidnapping, force, deceit, trafficking or sale of the minor, none of which were alleged in the present case.

The court further observed that the girl being a major and there being no complaint by the guardian of the boy, the objections raised by the counsel for the state was misconceived and premature.

It noted that the issue before the court was not the validity of the marriage but the protection of the couple’s fundamental rights.

Story continues below this ad

“As already noted, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the validity of the marriage at this stage, I am of the view that what needs to be addressed is the apprehension of the petitioners based on threat to their life and liberty for the reasons/circumstances as narrated in the petition,” the order read.

The court observed that the constitutional fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India stands on a much higher pedestal.

“Being sacrosanct under the Constitutional Scheme it must be protected, regardless of the solemnisation of an invalid or void marriage or even the absence of any marriage between the parties,” the court noted.

The court permitted the petitioners to live together as a married couple and directed that if they face any disturbance, they may approach the Senior Superintendent of Police or Superintendent of Police concerned, who must examine the complaint and provide immediate protection.

Story continues below this ad

The court clarified that it has not adjudicated on the validity of the marriage and/or genuineness of their marriage certificate claimed by the petitioners or the correct age of the petitioners.

It further clarified that the order has not been passed to protect the petitioners against any action or proceedings instituted in accordance with law.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.

Expertise

Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.

Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:

Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.

Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.

Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:

Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.

Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.

Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

Tags:

allahabad high court