Coca-Cola, Tesla and eBay Fight Trump’s Tariffs on Brazil

Trade

Key Facts

—The pushback. Coca-Cola, Tesla and eBay told the US Trade Representative to spare Brazilian imports from a proposed 25% Section 301 tariff.

—The hearing. A public hearing ran July 6 and 7 at the US International Trade Commission in Washington, drawing 365 written submissions.

—The deadline. The USTR faces a July 15 statutory deadline to decide on responsive action.

—The carve-outs. An exemption annex already shields more than 1,600 tariff lines, including roughly 430 tied to civil aircraft.

—The scope. The probe targets six Brazilian policy areas, from the Pix payment system to ethanol access and deforestation enforcement.

Some of America’s best-known companies have lined up against Washington’s own trade offensive, asking regulators to soften the Brazil tariffs that President Donald Trump’s team has spent a year preparing. Coca-Cola, Tesla and eBay all filed formal objections ahead of a hearing that closed this week.

The plea is striking because it comes not from Brasília but from the United States corporate mainstream. It reframes a fight that has looked like a clash between two governments as, in part, a clash inside the American economy itself.

Why American companies want the Brazil tariffs softened

The Office of the United States Trade Representative held a public hearing on July 6, continuing into July 7, at the International Trade Commission in Washington. It was the last formal step before the agency decides how hard to hit Brazilian goods.

The proposed measure is a twenty-five percent tariff on a broad range of Brazilian products, drawn up under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. That is the same legal tool the administration turned to after courts questioned its earlier, blanket tariff powers.

According to the trade office, the consultation drew three hundred and sixty-five submissions from companies, trade groups and individuals. The volume alone signals how much of the American supply chain runs through Brazil.

Coca-Cola asked the government to keep an existing exemption on orange raw materials imported from Brazil, and to add a similar carve-out for the lemon-based inputs it uses in drinks. The company warned that new duties would disrupt supply chains and lift manufacturing costs inside the United States.

Tesla struck a similar note. The carmaker said that despite heavy investment in a domestic supply chain, certain critical materials and components from Brazil are simply not available at the scale or quality it needs at home, and it urged carefully calibrated policy rather than a blunt levy.

The online marketplace eBay took a consumer angle, seeking exemptions for second-hand goods sold on its platform. It argued that tariffs would fall hardest on small sellers and could make many low-value cross-border sales uneconomic for millions of American shoppers.

The complaints cut across very different industries, from soft drinks to electric cars to online resale. What links them is a shared warning that a tariff meant to punish Brasília would land first on American factories, showrooms and checkout carts.

One of the sorest points in the underlying dispute is ethanol. American ethanol exports to Brazil collapsed from a peak of about seven hundred and sixty million dollars in 2018 to roughly fifty-three million dollars by 2024, after Brasília raised its duties, and Washington has cited that reversal as a core grievance.

What the fight means for investors

For anyone tracking Brazilian assets, the timing matters. The trade office faces a July 15 statutory deadline to decide on responsive action, which puts a hard date on a risk that had been drifting in the background for months.

Crucially, the design of the measure spares much of Brazil’s export base. An exemption annex covers more than one thousand six hundred tariff lines, including roughly four hundred and thirty tied to civil aircraft, while steel, aluminium and copper already sit under separate duties.

That helps explain a market pattern seen this week, when selling on the São Paulo exchange hit domestic-facing names harder than the big commodity exporters. Aircraft, coffee, beef and crude oil either fall in the exemption lists or are handled under other rules, blunting the direct blow to Brazil’s marquee shippers.

The corporate objections also feed into a wider negotiation. Presidents Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Trump met at the White House in May and set up a working group, and every filing that warns of American self-harm strengthens Brasília’s hand at the table.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the Brazil tariffs being proposed?

The United States Trade Representative has proposed a twenty-five percent tariff on a wide range of Brazilian goods under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. A large exemption annex shields more than one thousand six hundred tariff lines, and the agency faces a July 15 deadline to decide on final action.

Why is the United States investigating Brazil?

The Section 301 investigation targets six Brazilian policy areas the trade office calls unreasonable: digital trade and electronic payments including the Pix system, preferential tariffs, anti-corruption enforcement, intellectual property protection, ethanol market access and illegal deforestation. It was launched in July of last year at the president’s direction.

Which Brazilian exports are most exposed?

Several of Brazil’s largest exports, including aircraft, coffee, beef and petroleum products, sit in exemption annexes or fall under separate tariff rules, which limits their direct exposure. Domestic-facing sectors and smaller manufacturers without carve-outs stand to feel the sharpest effect if the duty takes effect.

In depth

Brazil inflation, Selic and rates 2026

Trump and US-Latin America policy 2026

The Rio Times · Power Map

See who really holds power in Latin America

Click to open the Power Map →