Meta patches the mod that turned its Ray-Ban glasses into secret spy cams

TL;DR

Meta is updating its Ray-Ban, Oakley, and own-brand smart glasses to disable the camera if the recording LED is physically tampered with or destroyed, closing a loophole modders used to record covertly. It is also removing mod-service listings, banning accounts, and weighing legal action. The fix reopens a bigger debate about whether camera-first glasses can ever be private, as cameraless rival Even Realities raises $150m at a $1bn valuation.

Meta is updating its smart glasses to shut off the camera if the recording light has been physically tampered with or destroyed. The change, announced in a 7 July blog post, closes a loophole that let modders turn the glasses into covert recorders.

A white LED lights up whenever the glasses capture photos or video, signalling to bystanders that they are being filmed. Meta already blocked recording if the light was covered with tape, but determined users drilled out the LED hardware to bypass it entirely.

The new software detects that hardware tampering and disables the camera until the light works again. It is rolling out to second-generation devices across Ray-Ban Meta, Oakley Meta, and Meta’s own $300 glasses line.

Meta is also going after the people selling the mods. The company said it will remove ads and Marketplace listings for such services, ban accounts, and pursue legal action against individuals and businesses that tamper with its tech.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It's free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

A fix that does not settle the bigger problem

The patch lands amid a sustained privacy reckoning for the category. Meta’s glasses have sold in the millions while the people being filmed have little recourse, and contractors have reported reviewing intimate footage captured through them.

This is not the first tweak to the recording light either, with the indicator already central to a wider privacy fight that includes public-space bans. Critics also worry about future modes that could suppress the light while the camera runs.

None of this touches the deeper design choice, since a camera on your face is the source of the anxiety. Meta has leaned hard into capture, betting the convenience of hands-free photos and AI that sees your surroundings outweighs the discomfort.

The cameraless alternative gains ground

A rival camp is betting the opposite. Even Realities, a Shenzhen startup founded by ex-Apple engineers, just raised $150m at a $1bn valuation in a round led by Meituan and Tencent.

Its glasses skip the camera entirely, projecting green text and simple graphics into the wearer’s view for navigation, translation, and notifications. With no lens pointed at the world, there is nothing to secretly record.

The trade-off is capability, and reviewers have found display-first glasses more limited and less polished than camera models. TechRadar’s tester judged them not yet worth wearing, arguing the camera’s usefulness still wins on value despite the privacy cost.

That tension defines a young market where Meta holds a commanding lead, even as Apple and others circle the eyewear business. Meta’s update makes its spy-cam problem harder to exploit, but the question of whether the world wants cameras on every face is one a software patch cannot answer.