23-day-old child suffers genital deformity after circumcision, mother wins Rs 50 lakh

4 min readNew DelhiJul 17, 2026 06:30 AM IST

The doctor and hospital had denied negligence. (Photo: Getty Images/Thinkstock)

A consumer commission in Kerala has directed a doctor and a private hospital to pay Rs 50 lakh to the mother of a child who suffered permanent genital deformity after a circumcision procedure performed when he was just 23-days old.

President Mohandasan K and members Preethi Sivaraman C and Mohamed Ismayil C V observed that the compensation was necessary considering the tender age of the child, pain and suffering undergone, future medical care and reconstructive treatment including multiple surgeries, loss of amenities of life, psychological consequences and the uncertainty regarding future urinary, sexual and reproductive functions.

“The evidence on record establishes that the infant who was only 23 days old underwent circumcision and developed serious complications immediately thereafter,” the order read.

The commission observed that there were serious deficiencies in the manner in which the procedure was undertaken and in the facilities available at the hospital.

Circumcision gone wrong

According to the complaint, the infant underwent circumcision at the hospital. His mother alleged that immediately after the procedure, the child experienced difficulty passing urine, persistent crying and urine leakage through the dressing. Despite repeated visits to the hospital, his condition deteriorated and he developed an infection.

He was eventually referred to higher medical centres in Thrissur, where he underwent emergency treatment, including urinary diversion surgery. It was alleged that the child’s penis suffered severe damage.

The complainant alleged that the treating doctor lacked sufficient experience in performing circumcisions and that the hospital lacked adequate facilities and proper sterilisation protocols. The family sought Rs 50 lakh in compensation for medical negligence, future treatment and lifelong suffering.

Story continues below this ad

The doctor and hospital denied negligence and said that the circumcision had been performed in accordance with accepted medical standards. They claimed the parents failed to administer the prescribed medicines and did not return for follow-up on the next day. It was stated that the hospital possessed all necessary facilities for conducting circumcision procedures and that there was no lapse, negligence or deficiency in service on their part.

Case of medical negligence

Relying upon medical records the commission found that within a few days of the circumcision procedure, the child had developed serious complications 36 including infection, tissue sloughing, meatal stenosis, and compromised viability of the distal penis, necessitating specialised tertiary care management.

The commission placed reliance on an inquiry conducted by a medical team constituted by the district medical officer.

Age at Time of Procedure

23 Days

Kerala consumer commission cites tender age and lifelong consequences in negligence ruling

₹50 Lakh Compensation Breakdown

₹25 L

Pain, suffering & psychological impact

₹25 L

Future treatment & reconstructive surgeries

₹25K

Litigation costs

Complications Following Procedure

Infection and tissue sloughing

Meatal stenosis developed

Compromised organ viability

Emergency urinary diversion surgery required

Lifelong Uncertainty Cited by Commission

Future urinary function uncertain

Future sexual function uncertain

Future reproductive function uncertain

Multiple reconstructive surgeries required over lifetime

Joint & Several Liability

Doctor, hospital owner, and hospital held jointly liable for deficiencies in sterilization protocols and record-keeping

Express InfoGenIE

“The report discloses several serious deficiencies in the functioning and maintenance of the hospital, particularly with respect to infection control measures, sterilization procedures, operation theatre maintenance, and patient safety protocols. The enquiry team found that the hospital did not maintain proper records relating to fumigation procedures or the dates on which such procedures were conducted,” the order noted.

Story continues below this ad

The commission observed that the enquiry team also opined that proper sterilisation protocols had not been followed and that surgical instruments were used without adherence to accepted standards of sterilisation, which could have contributed to the early onset of infection noticed in the child.

The commission remarked that the sequence of events, the nature of the injuries reflected in the treatment records and the findings of the expert medical team collectively constitute circumstances from which negligence could be inferred.

The commission further stressed that there was no evidence to suggest that the injuries were attributable to any negligence or omission on the part of the parents.

“The opposite parties were under a duty to provide a convincing medical explanation for the injuries sustained by the infant. No such satisfactory explanation has been forthcoming. On the contrary, the evidence on record establishes lack of adequate hygiene, deficiencies in facilities, inadequate expertise and failure to maintain proper records relating to the procedure,” the order read.

Story continues below this ad

Holding the doctor, the hospital owner and the hospital jointly and severally liable, the commission awarded Rs 25 lakh as compensation for pain, suffering, lifelong loss of amenities, psychological consequences and uncertainty regarding future urinary, sexual and reproductive functions. It further awarded Rs 25 lakh towards future medical treatment, including multiple reconstructive surgeries and Rs 25,000 as litigation costs.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

Ashish Shaji is a Senior Sub-Editor at The Indian Express, where he specializes in legal journalism. Combining a formal education in law with years of editorial experience, Ashish provides authoritative coverage and nuanced analysis of court developments and landmark judicial decisions for a national audience.

Expertise

Legal Core Competency: Ashish is a law graduate (BA LLB) from IME Law College, CCSU. This academic foundation allows him to move beyond surface-level reporting, offering readers a deep-dive into the technicalities of statutes, case law, and legal precedents.

Specialized Legal Reporting: His work at The Indian Express focuses on translating the often-dense proceedings of India's top courts into clear, actionable news. His expertise includes:

Judicial Analysis: Breaking down complex orders from the Supreme Court and various High Courts.

Legal Developments: Monitoring legislative changes and their practical implications for the public and the legal fraternity.

Industry Experience: With over 5 years in the field, Ashish has contributed to several niche legal and professional platforms, honing his ability to communicate complex information. His previous experience includes:

Lawsikho: Gaining insights into legal education and practical law.

Verdictum: Focusing on high-quality legal news and court updates.

Enterslice: Working at the intersection of legal, financial, and advisory services. ... Read More

Tags:

consumer court