Man wins Rs 14,000 after internet provider denies full refund under ‘30-day trial’ offer

4 min readNew DelhiJul 17, 2026 02:46 PM IST

The connection was installed on November 11, 2020, but the service allegedly broke down on November 26, prompting him to register a complaint the same day. (AI-generated image)

A consumer commission in Kerala has found Reliance Retail guilty of unfair trade practice after a consumer who subscribed to a JioFiber connection under a “free 30-day trial” offer was denied a full refund despite seeking disconnection within the trial period. The commission directed the company to refund the balance amount of Rs 1,000 and pay Rs 13,000 towards compensation and litigation costs.

President P V Jayarajan, along with members Preetha G Nair and Viju V R of Thiruvananthapuram District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, was hearing the complaint filed by one P V Sivasankara Pillai, who obtained a JioFiber connection in November 2020 after coming across a leaflet advertising the trial offer.

“But the opposite parties 1 and 2 (Reliance Retail Ltd) have not produced any evidence to prove that the complainant has discontinued the connection after the completion of the 30-day period, and also, as per Exts A1 (leaflet), the complainant is eligible for a full refund of Rs 1,500,” the July 10 order read.

Free trial, years of legal battle

Pillai claimed that he booked a JioFiber Internet connection after coming across their advertisement for a “free 30-day trial”, which also said: “If you do not like it, we take back, no questions asked”, offering a full refund of the deposit offer.

The complainant cancelled his existing internet connection and enrolled in the JioFiber trial offer after paying a refundable deposit of Rs 1,500 on November 2, 2020. The connection was installed on November 11, 2020. However, the service allegedly broke down on November 26, 2020, prompting him to register a complaint the same day. After several calls and emails to customer care, the issue was allegedly resolved in December 2020.

Claiming dissatisfaction with the modem’s performance, Pillai requested disconnection of the service and a refund of the deposit on December 3, 2020. Subsequently, a JioFiber technician collected all the equipment and allegedly assured him that the refund would be processed within 14 working days.

However, only Rs 500 was refunded on December 29, 2020, instead of the full deposit amount of Rs 1,500. Pillai later issued a legal notice, following which the company informed him that it was unable to retrieve his details because his JioFiber ID was allegedly incorrect. Advocate T Harikumar represented the complainant.

Story continues below this ad

Not eligible for refund: JioFiber

JioFiber’s counsel, R Suja Madhav, submitted that the district commission was not the correct forum to decide cases against JioFiber, as it can only be filed before courts in Mumbai.

The counsel, however, admitted that the complainant had a JioFiber service for which Rs 1,500 was received from him. As per the terms and conditions, the complainant was eligible only for a refund of Rs 500, it was argued, adding that since the complainant had discontinued the connection after the 30-day period, he was not eligible for a full refund.

JioFiber further claimed that it had sent a reply on April 15, 2021, requesting the complainant to furnish the correct JioFiber ID number, but allegedly received no response. It denied any deficiency in service and sought dismissal of the complaint.

‘Leaflet promised refund’

The commission examined the leaflet and noted the free 30-day trial offer and refund option on dissatisfaction. It observed that the company’s promotional material indicated that there would be no security deposit or installation charges for the internet and set-top box.

Story continues below this ad

Holding that the company failed to prove its claim that the consumer had discontinued the service after the expiry of the trial period, the commission directed Reliance Retail to refund the remaining Rs 1,000 with 6 per cent interest from February 25, 2022, pay Rs 10,000 as compensation for mental agony, and Rs 3,000 towards litigation costs.

Significance of ruling

The ruling underscores that companies may be held liable for unfair trade practices if they fail to honour promises made in advertisements and promotional offers, particularly where consumers act upon such representations.

For consumer-related grievances, individuals may contact the consumer helpline in their respective states and Union territories (Kerala: 1800-425-1550) or call the National Consumer Helpline at 1915 for assistance.

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

Richa Sahay is a Legal Correspondent for The Indian Express, where she focuses on simplifying the complexities of the Indian judicial system. A law postgraduate, she leverages her advanced legal education to bridge the gap between technical court rulings and public understanding, ensuring that readers stay informed about the rapidly evolving legal landscape.

Expertise

Advanced Legal Education: As a law postgraduate, Richa possesses the academic depth required to interpret intricate statutes and constitutional nuances. Her background allows her to provide more than just summaries; she offers context-driven analysis of how legal changes impact the average citizen.

Specialized Beat: She operates at the intersection of law and public policy, focusing on:

Judicial Updates: Providing timely reports on orders from the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts.

Legal Simplification: Translating dense "legalese" into accessible, engaging narratives without sacrificing factual accuracy.

Legislative Changes: Monitoring new bills, amendments, and regulatory shifts that shape Indian society. ... Read More

Tags:

consumer court

JioFiber

Reliance