During a hearing held Monday (July 6) by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) in Washington, Brazilians and Americans challenged the Donald Trump administration's criticism of Pix, Brazil's Central Bank instant payment system.
The U.S. agency is investigating Brazil under Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act and accuses the Central Bank of unfairly and discriminatorily favoring Pix over other payment methods, a process that resulted in a recommendation to impose an additional 25% tariff on Brazilian products.
None of the participants on the first day of hearings supported the claim that Pix harms U.S. companies. Melinda St. Louis, of the U.S. consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said that "the idea behind Pix was to increase financial inclusion and promote competition," describing the system as public digital infrastructure rather than a private company competing with American firms. She noted that Google is the largest initiator of transactions on the system.
Vinícius Nunes Pinto, who helped implement Pix and now works in the technology sector in the United States, said that "Pix is a rail, an infrastructure. We do not judge a road by who collects the toll, but by what it enables an economy to do."
He advocated greater cooperation between the two countries and suggested a future integration between Pix and FedNow, the Federal Reserve's instant payment system. Concluding his remarks, he said: "Instead of tariffs, I suggest cooperation and dialogue between FedNow and Pix. Imagine the rails connected, allowing a company in Ohio to receive instant payments from São Paulo."
Economist Gustavo Pessoa also challenged the use of Pix as grounds for a trade dispute, proposing that the two countries establish common criteria for evaluating public payment systems. The hearings continue on Tuesday, with Brazilian Senator Flávio Bolsonaro (PL-RJ) expected to participate.
Read the article in the original language
News from Brazil
Receive in your email inbox a summary of the day
View original source — Folha de S.Paulo ↗
