NBI exec: Evidence points to Sara Duterte's kill plot against Marcos

MANILA, Philippines—While admitting he had no personal knowledge that Vice President Sara Duterte hired a person to kill President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Regional Director Jeremy Lotoc insisted that the evidence they gathered linked her to it.

At the continuation of his cross-examination during Duterte’s impeachment trial on Tuesday, defense lawyer Mark Vinluan pressed Lotoc on whether he had personal knowledge that Duterte had contracted someone to kill the president, first lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former House Speaker Martin Romualdez.

READ: Sara Duterte trial: Witness admits no direct knowledge of alleged hitman

Article continues after this advertisement

“We do believe that the Vice President had contracted [someone], but I don’t have personal knowledge, if that is the personal knowledge you want to know about. But we do believe this based on the evidence that we’ve gathered and based on our investigation,” Lotoc said.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

As head of the NBI’s Crime Division at the time, the witness led the investigation into Duterte’s assassination threats made during an online media briefing on Nov. 23, 2024.

Duterte’s kill remark was included in the fourth article of impeachment filed against her.

LIVE UPDATES: Impeachment trial of VP Sara Duterte | July 14, 2026

‘This is not a college debate’

At one point during the cross-examination, presiding officer Sen. Francis “Chiz” Escudero reminded the defense and prosecution counsels that they were not in a “college debate” as they quarreled over Duterte’s kill remark.

Article continues after this advertisement

This happened when Vinluan initially asked Lotoc whether Duterte’s corruption allegations against certain individuals mentioned in the same video were “true and happened in real life.”

“As to the existence of those utterances, yes, sir,” Lotoc answered.

Article continues after this advertisement

“So you just admitted that the congressmen are all corrupt,” Vinluan remarked.

Private prosecutor Amando Ligutan objected to the “foul side remark,” saying Vinluan was “twisting the answer of the witness.”

Escudero advised the lawyers to settle down and directed the witness to provide complete and specific answers to avoid any misinterpretation.

Lotoc confirmed the “existence of Duterte’s utterances” in the video, but added he had no personal knowledge of whether all her allegations actually happened.

“In the same way, you also don’t have personal knowledge that Vice President Sara contracted an assassin,” Vinluan said.

The defense lawyer stopped Lotoc when the latter was about to point to Duterte’s own remarks in the video.

“That’s answerable by yes or no,” Vinluan said.

When Ligutan retorted that the witness was already answering the question, Escudero intervened again.

“Counsel, counsel, kindly settle down. This is not a college debate,” the presiding officer said, directing the witness to answer Vinluan’s question.

Lotoc complied with the presiding officer and answered in the affirmative.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

“That utterance made by the Vice President that she contracted a person? I do believe that, sir, because of the pieces of evidence that we’ve gathered, sir,” the NBI agent stressed. /mcm